The post is to advise members about the Annual General Meeting transport arrangements.Venue: The Cliffs Hotel, Blackpool
Time: 10.15 am
Arrive DWP Site, Norcross, Norcross Lane, Blackpool (Main Entrance) 9:30 am
Depart: 9:35 am
Depart: 10:00 am
The post is to advise members about the Annual General Meeting transport arrangements.
Fylde Central Benefits and Services Branch are holding an Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) awareness event as February is LGBT History Month.
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Trans History Month takes place every year in February. It celebrates the lives and achievements of the LGBT community. We are committed to celebrate its diversity and that of the society as a whole. We encourage everyone to see diversity and cultural pluralism as the positive forces that they are and endeavour to reflect this in all we do.
Encourage anyone you know in HPe (formerly EDS) to join his colleagues and support the campaign
PCS members in HP Enterprise Services are angry that public money is being spent on large CEO salaries and expenses, rather than rewarding hard working employees who consistently deliver high quality IT services to both the DWP and other clients.
Mark Hurd, the HP CEO received a total compensation package of $42,514,524 (US) for the year end 31 October 2008. In the same year, he spent $135,734 (US) on his personal use of the HP corporate jet!
Is this fair when the members jobs are not secure and they've been asked to take pay cuts?
Encourage members to support the campaign and tell Mark Hurd and HP Enterprise Services that enough is enough!
Our union at HP Enterprise Services PCS is campaigning for:
- Improved job security for all PCS members in the North West and North East – no compulsory redundancies
- Improved pay for those covered by collective bargaining
- An annual pay review for all staff
Below are some suggestions about how our HPe PCS colleagues can support the campaign for fairness at work:
It is clear that the Government are preparing to cut more jobs on the cheap. Cutting the compensation makes it cheaper to get rid of people. (There is also concern about the standard of the jobs for those left after the job cuts. Due to attacks on Conditions of Service following the job cuts many of the posts are now of the call centre type).
Membership support for the Campaign
The reaction of members to the Government’s proposals was tested in a series of workplace meetings held in September and October 2009. Over 35,000 members came to 1000 meetings making it the largest such exercise the union has carried out. The overwhelming majority made it very clear that they supported the union’s objectives to protect members’ existing entitlements. More than 80% said that they would support campaigning action if negotiations do not produce the result we need.
The views of members were also made clear in the responses to the Government’s consultation. 18,000 comments were sent to the Cabinet Office, the overwhelming majority of which clearly opposed the proposed cuts to the scheme. This was a marvellous response which communicated effectively the depth of feeling on the issue to the employer.
Legal action
The National Executive Committee has agreed to instigate a judicial review to halt the process by which the Government seems intent of removing members’ accrued rights under the CSCS.
Lobbying of MPs
115 MPs have signed up to an early day motion on the CSCS. Over 100 signatures for an EDM on an industrial issue is a tremendous level of support. This reflects effective lobbying by many members in constituencies, and MPs’ increased receptiveness to that in the run-up to a General Election. The Branch has written to all four local MPs who represent the Fylde area asking for the support.
Further negotiations
Previously the Government has announced that it has come to its ‘final decision’ on the matter. Nevertheless, the Cabinet Office has now agreed to meet the unions to discuss the proposals. The unions have agreed to further discussions in order to make one last effort at finding a way forward without the need for legal or other campaigning action. At the time of writing, however, there was no indication that progress at the meeting towards addressing our substantive concerns is imminent.
Conclusion
In 2010 there will be a General Election and the Branch will be contacting the candidates to ask where they all stand on all the above issues and will provide assistance to members who may also wish to ask the candidates about such matters.
The Branch will ensure that we play our full role in the Campaigning Action that may be needed. Further details will be issued in due course.

The Government’s proposed changes to the CSCS threaten to tear up members’ accrued contractual rights and drastically cut compensation payments in the event of redundancy, whether compulsory or voluntary. They would make job cuts cheaper at a time when we know that all the main political parties are planning huge public spending cuts. All members would be at greater risk of redundancy.
Meetings have taken place with government Ministers to make clear our objections and seek new proposals. We have worked hard in an attempt to secure an acceptable settlement. But, so far, the employer has refused to come to an agreement with us.
The NPC is co-ordinating a major demonstration along with a number of trade unions, the BMA, RADAR (the disability group) and others in defence of the welfare state and public services on Saturday 10 April 2010 in central London.
Whilst there is still a considerable amount of organising to be done, it is vital that NPC regions and EC representatives begin to encourage large numbers of people to take part.To help, there are a number of resources we have produced:
Please encourage as many supporters as possible to sign it in advance of the demo.
If you require any further information, don't hesitate to get in touch.
In the meantime, we must get the message across that this is THE opportunity for every pensioner to demonstrate on the key issues of pensions and care.
A copy of the flyer advertising the event can be seen here.
The following details have been supplied by the PCS DWP Group:
It is clear that the Government are preparing to cut more jobs on the cheap. Cutting the compensation makes it cheaper to get rid of people. There is every likelihood of their being a ballot of the members in January 2010 for Campaigning Action to defend our conditions of service and jobs. (There is also concern about the standard of the jobs for those left after the job cuts. Due to attacks on Conditions of Service following the job cuts many of the posts are now of the call centre type).
Pay 2010: PCS have warned that capping pay would further undermine morale and entrench low pay in the civil service where 1 in 5 earn less than £15,000. Pay in the Civil Service (DWP) is lower than that of comparable jobs in the private sector with pay gaps of more than £5,000 between the civil service and private sector.
The Chancellor announced a new pay cap of 1 percent pay increases for the next three years in the Public Sector.
Pay cuts and pay freezes have been a common feature for civil servants as the Government has sought to drive down pay over the past few years, with all of the DWP staff receiving a 0% pay rise last year and 1% this year.
There has not been a golden decade of pay rises in the DWP with people getting on average a one percent pay rise over the past three years; however we are being asked to pay for the financial crisis none of which was our doing. Now to tell people that their pay rises are going to be capped at 1 percent for the next three years, making 6 years in total, is grossly unfair.
In reality, because of the fact that, uniquely in the Public Sector, pay progression in the Civil Service is costed out of Annual Pay rounds, this means negative pay rises, i.e. pay cuts of -1%, or alternatively no pay progression.
To explain this; without Pay progression, two people doing the same identical jobs, but one is paid up to £5,000 per annum less than the other, in perpetuity. Imagine if an MP was paid £5,000 per annum less than another in perpetuity, there would be uproar. Members will be undoubtedly very angry at those responsible for this injustice.
Pensions: Members will be concerned over moves to cap employer contributions to public sector pensions. Only two years ago the Government made a commitment to the public sector unions. This led to the closing of the Civil Service final salary schemes to new members and the introduction of a career average scheme (not based on final salary) as well as existing staff being able to continue in the scheme that they have been part of. There are five different Pensions Schemes now in existence in the Civil Service.
There are two myths about Civil Service Pensions. Firstly there is the one that the final salary schemes are still open. They are not. They closed to new members in 2007. Second is that the all Civil Servants are on gold plated pension. Far from being gold plated, the average civil service pension is £6,500. Pensions are deferred income not a lavish perk.
The question is does the Government want people to work until they are 80 (if they survive) whilst young people cannot find work? This is not a logical way to proceed.
Conclusion: The Branch will ensure that we play our full role in the Campaigning Action that is needed. In 2010 there will be a General Election and the Branch will be contacting the candidates to ask where they all stand on all the above issues and will provide assistance to members who may also wish to ask the candidates about such matters.