28.3.11

Killer blow for workplace safety

The following has been supplied by the TUC:

Unions and campaigners have reacted with horror and anger to the government's new safety strategy. RMT general secretary Bob Crow said: 'When ConDem ministers talk about easing regulation what they mean is removing it, and when it comes to health and safety that is a charter for death and injury. There are already far too few workplace inspections and it is already next to impossible to get bosses whose negligence causes injury, death or disease at work to face legal consequences.' Referring to comments made by employment minister Chris Grayling, CWU general secretary Billy Hayes said: 'What on earth is wrong with Britain having a 'health and safety culture'?' He added: 'If employers know their premises won't be inspected, it's blindingly obvious that they'll start to let standards slip.' A spokesperson for construction union UCATT said: 'These plans will allow employers to ignore safety rules, as they will know that they will not be prosecuted. Workers should not be forced to play Russian roulette with their safety.' Hazards Campaign spokesperson Hilda Palmer said the government strategy 'is dangerously illogical, will have major detrimental impacts on workers' health and lives, and is a completely false economy as it ignores the evidence that the major burden of poor health and safety falls not on employers, but on workers and their families, but also the taxpayer.' Linda Whelan, a founder member of Families Against Corporate Killers (FACK) and whose son Craig died in a workplace fireball, said: 'None of our family members was killed by red tape or employers fearing enforcement. They were killed because of the exact opposite - too little if any time spent on health and safety, and no fear of being found out.'

Cost-cutting will cost lives

The following details have been supplied by the TUC:

Cost-cutting not deregulation is behind a package of measures announced by the government and will undermine the work of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the inspectors' union has warned. Prospect was commenting on the government's new safety strategy which will bring a further review of regulation, a dramatic reduction in proactive regulation - down by a third, a reduction of 11,000 inspections a year - and the introduction of more fees for employers when HSE inspectors find fault. Prospect negotiator Mike Macdonald said the new strategy 'shows that health and safety regulation in Britain is now driven by the government's wish to cut spending rather than by a professional assessment of what action saves lives and avoids accidents. The key question should be what type of regulation best suits British business and its workforce, not a simplistic dogma that all regulation is bad.' Commenting on the regulatory review, to be headed by Professor Ragnar E Lofstedt of King's College London, he added: 'It looks as if the government is determined to announce cuts before Professor Ragnar Löfstedt even starts his review. What happens if he concludes that more inspection, not less, is required?' Prospect members in HSE are convinced that proactive inspection is vital, not least because prevention is cheaper and better for business, employees and the taxpayer than the cost of putting lives back together after an accident, Macdonald said. He added: 'We understand that the removal of proactive inspection from lower-risk workplaces is one of the least damaging options. But the government should recognise that this still means lives are being risked to achieve 35 per cent budget cuts... We have to ask, is health and safety such a low priority that it deserves such a cut with the knock-on impact on taxpayers who work?'

Official plan means less justice, more deaths

The following details have been supplied by the TUC:

A new government safety strategy that will mean an unprecedented reduction in the number of workplace safety inspections, no proactive inspections for the majority of firms and new quickie risk assessments for millions of businesses will lead to more deaths and injuries at work, the TUC has said. The warning came this week as the government launched its 'Good health and safety, Good for everyone' strategy. The new blueprint will be accompanied by a review of all workplace safety legislation and has been welcomed by the business lobby but slammed by safety campaigners. Announcing the changes, employment minister Chris Grayling said: 'Of course it is right to protect employees in the workplace, but Britain's health and safety culture is also stifling business and holding back economic growth. The purpose of health and safety regulation is to protect people at work and rightly so. But we need common sense at the heart of the system, and these measures will help root out the needless burden of bureaucracy.' He added: 'This will help us make Britain a more growth focused, entrepreneurial nation. By reducing unnecessary red tape we can encourage businesses to come and invest in the UK, creating jobs and opportunities when we need them most.' But TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said it was a lose-lose package. 'Employers need to know that there is the possibility of a safety inspector visiting, otherwise there will be no incentive for them to ensure they are protecting their workers. Removing proactive inspections from a large number of workplaces means that employers can get away with ignoring the law until they kill or seriously injure someone. This is in no-one's interests and will mean an increase in deaths and injuries, leading to a rush to the bottom as cowboy companies undercut responsible employers by cutting back on safety.' He added: 'The proposals are not only bad for workers' health and safety, they will also be bad for the economy as the health service and benefits system have to deal with the aftermath of more injuries and illnesses caused through unsafe work. The strategy is not about better regulation, it is about deregulation and is all part of a bigger plan to reduce the rights that workers have to safety and fair treatment.'

22.3.11

Preston Against Cuts Event

Received from Preston Trades Council:

Dear friend,

Please see details of major event organised to fight the cuts across Lancashire. Organised by Preston Against the Cuts on behalf of the County. Please circulate widely.

Lynne Wallace (Secretary of Preston & South Ribble Trades Council).

Saturday 2nd April 2011
1:30pm to 3:30pm
53 Degrees, Brook Street, Preston, PR1 7BQ.

Speakers: Chris Bamberry (Secretary, Right to Work campaign), Cllr Simon Blackburn (Leader of Blackpool Labour Group), Cllr Matthew Brown (Preston, Lab), Billy Hayes (General Secretary of the CWU), Cllr Michael Lavalette (Preston, Ind), Alice Mahon (former Labour MP), John McDonnell MP (LRC Chair), Lynne Wallace (Secretary of Preston & South Ribble Trades Council)

Entrance: Free

Blackpool Against Cuts Facebook Page

Here's one for use at home.

Blackpool Against Cuts now has a Facebook page. It can be found here.

TUC warns of safety 'race to the bottom'

The following details have been supplied by the TUC:

Rogue companies will be the major beneficiaries of a dramatic cut in the Health and Safety Executive's resources, the TUC has warned. In a keynote address to the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) conference this week, TUC head of safety Hugh Robertson said: 'I don't agree that the cuts are necessary, nor do I believe that health and safety is a special case. The health service, education and social care are all important and we must show that there are alternatives to the cuts. He added that cuts to safety would lead to more expenditure by the NHS and employers as injuries and illnesses rose. He said 'money put into safety is an investment. If we reduce that investment, it will have a significant effect on lives and the ability of employers to support their workers.' He criticised the government's 'hands-off' approach to regulation, noting 'we have known since the 19th century that regulation is the only thing that works. Regulation and enforcement mean a level playing field and good employers shouldn't have to race to the bottom because non-compliant companies are breaking the law. We need the eyes and ears of inspectors in the workplace but these cuts will mean fewer inspectors and inspections.' Lawrence Waterman, head of health and safety for the Olympic Delivery Authority, accused HSE of losing its intellectual leadership in the debate about cost savings - a term he described as an 'obfuscation' for cuts. He expressed disappointment that the HSE had not provided a more coherent 'opposition' to the cuts by emphasising more clearly the business case for investing in health and safety. Safety minister Chris Grayling is expected to announce on 21 March the government's latest plans for workplace health and safety, including a further review of legislation. The TUC is organising a major demonstration against the cuts, and promoting alternatives, on 26th March in London.

'Raw deal' for sick British staff

The following details have been supplied by the TUC:

British workers are among the worst protected in terms of benefits if they are off work sick, according to a new report. A study of 12 countries by Demos put Britain in eighth place in the level of protection in case of ill-health, below countries including France, Germany, the United States and Canada. 'Of mutual benefit', produced by the think tank's 'Progressive Conservatism Project', said savers and homeowners were 'penalised' by means testing for savings above £16,000 if they were off work ill. Max Wind-Cowie, author of the report, said: 'Our welfare system is badly broken, and with people living and working longer we need to make sickness and disability support sustainable. The squeezed middle get a raw deal - contributing to a so-called safety net that can't protect them from financial shocks.' The report notes: 'Successive efforts to reform the way in which incapacity benefits are assessed and paid in the UK have played on a suspicion that many who claim them are 'scroungers' and 'benefit cheats' to justify increased conditionality and more stringent testing. But the truth is that incapacity benefits in the UK are not only low but also insufficient for most people's financial needs. They may be hugely expensive overall, but they are relatively ungenerous at the individual and household level.' Demos describes itself as the 'leading centre of progressive Conservative thinking in the UK.'

No job is better for you than a bad job

The following details have been supplied by the TUC:

As the government presses ahead with plans to force the sick back to work and job seekers into 'Mandatory Work Activity placements', new research has blown a hole in its 'work is good for you' mantra. A study published this week warns while good quality jobs deliver health benefits, bad jobs can leave you in a worse state of health than remaining unemployed. Following on from its heavily criticised health reassessments of incapacity benefit claimants, the government this week announced that where Jobcentre Plus advisers 'believe a jobseeker will benefit from experiencing the habits and routines of working life, they will have the power to refer them to a four week mandatory placement.' Participants will be expected to spend up to 30 hours a week, for four weeks, on the placement and will be required to continue to look for work. Employment minister Chris Grayling said: 'I've been really worried by some of the job search interviews I've sat through where people are clearly losing their focus and just aren't getting any closer to a job.' However, TUC and others have warned that applicants outstrip vacancies by at least five-to-one, and there is particularly a shortage of good jobs. A study published this week concluded that while overall the unemployed had poorer mental health than those who were employed, 'the mental health of those who were unemployed was comparable or superior to those in jobs of the poorest psychosocial quality.' The Australian research team say their findings, published online in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, show: 'The health benefits of becoming employed were dependent on the quality of the job. Moving from unemployment into a high quality job led to improved mental health... however the transition from unemployment to a poor quality job was more detrimental to mental health than remaining unemployed.'

14.3.11

Stress soars with rising job fear

Job cuts and runaway insecurity at work have led to a sharp upturn in workplace stress, a union survey has found. The poll for the Trade Union Co-ordinating Group (TUCG) found 1 in 5 workers report they are having to work harder as a result of job cuts in their workplace, with 1 in 7 in fear of losing their job.

Over a quarter (26 per cent) of all workers feel more stressed now than a year ago, the survey found. Mark Serwotka, general secretary of TUCG member union PCS, commented: 'This survey reveals the rising levels of stress and insecurity in the workplace. With government plans for further cuts to jobs, pensions and pay on the horizon this situation is only going to deteriorate in the next 12 months.'

Steve Gillan, general secretary of the prison officers' union POA said: 'This survey shows the real concerns of British workers as budget cuts come to fruition. These stress levels are a cause for concern. The cuts are deep and too quick, which will damage the confidence of workers not only in the public sector, but private sector. This health and safety survey will soon spark anger amongst workers very quickly.'

And Bob Crow, general secretary of the transport union RMT said: 'This important research shows that a culture of fear is sweeping through Britain's workplaces as employers use the threat of the sack to demand longer hours for less money as the spectre of two and half million on the dole hangs over workers' heads.' He added: 'Bullying and harassment is rife and the first thing to take the hit is safe working practices as the ConDem cuts agenda threatens to turn the tide on gains on workers' rights and workplace safety that have been secured since the Second World War.' TUCG is made up of 10 national unions - BFAWU, FBU, NAPO, NUJ, NUT, PCS, POA, RMT, UCU and URTU - and represents almost 1 million workers.

11.3.11

For Jobs, Pensions and Fair Pay

On Saturday 26th March 2011 the Branches in the Fylde will be attending the TUC March for the Alternative in London, in which PCS is playing a leading role. The March for the Alternative will be advancing the need for a positive agenda going forward, one of jobs not unemployment, of fair pensions, not poverty in old age and for fair pay, not pay freezes for the Public Sector workers.

For Jobs. The Civil Service (particularly the Department for Work and Pensions) is one of (if not the) largest employers on the Fylde Coast, however recent Ministerial figures indicate that there are now circa 5,000 DWP staff on the Fylde Coast. There used to be thousands more.

There have already been over two thousand one hundred jobs cuts on the Fylde. The Government wants to cut many more Civil Service jobs, both in DWP and SPVA. The Government wants to slash the compensation that we would receive when we lose our jobs. This is grossly unjust.

For Pensions. Pensions are deferred pay. The Interim Hutton report indicates that we should now be expected to pay an average of an additional 3% for our Pensions. The full report is expected shortly and may contain further attacks.

For Fair Pay. Freezing Public Sector Pay (or severely restricting pay rises) is unfair, particularly so in the Civil Service as the cost of our Pay Progression comes out of the Pay Rise, unlike other areas of the Public Sector where it is funded separately.

The Positive Alternative
We didn’t create the financial mess, why should we be expected to pay for the excesses of the financial speculators with our jobs, our pensions and our pay. There is an alternative. That is to collect taxes. At present there are £120 billion of evaded, avoidance and uncollected taxes, mainly owed by the rich and big business. They avoid paying taxes (Corporation Tax, VAT, and Income Tax). They should be made to pay their fair dues and the country should use this money to invest in services, jobs, pensions and to build a better society.

What you can do to help
We would encourage all members to write to their MPs and ask them if they will be supporting the Alternative, and if they will be standing up for the Fylde.

The PCS "There is an Alternative" campaigns page can be found here.

New disability test 'is a complete mess'

The following details have been supplied by the PCS HQ:

One of the architects of the government's new sickness benefit system has warned it would be a mistake to start introducing it nationwide from the end of this month because of serious ongoing problems with the medical test designed to assess whether claimants are genuinely sick or disabled. 'The test is badly malfunctioning. The current assessment is a complete mess,'

Professor Paul Gregg, an economist and welfare reform expert, said. During the preliminary roll-out of the test, people with terminal cancer, multiple sclerosis and serious mental illnesses have been found fit to work. Since early 2009, more than 240,000 cases contesting the result of the health tests have been accepted for tribunal hearings and, of the cases they hear, judges overturn about 40 per cent of test findings. Over the next three years, 1.5 million people claiming incapacity benefit will undergo a work capability assessment (WCA) to determine whether they are eligible for a replacement benefit, employment support allowance (ESA). An independent review of the test in November last year found serious flaws in the way it was functioning and called for major improvements.

The government promised to implement these recommendations before people begin to be retested, at a rate of 11,000 a week. Gregg, who helped design the new ESA, recommends a further trial before it is introduced nationally. He said: 'The test so far has caused a huge amount of anguish to the people who have gone through it. We need to have something that is working accurately before we apply it nationally. We shouldn't roll this out until we have something that is working.'

Campaigners warn 'cuts will kill'

The following has been supplied by PCS HQ:

Unions and campaigners have warned a government attack on workplace safety will kill. At a 2 March Trade Union Co-ordinating Group meeting in the House of Commons, health and safety advocates drove home the dangers of cuts to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and moves to downgrade workplace safety protection.

Paula Brown, who chairs the HSE branch of the union PCS, said the 35 per cent cut in the watchdog's budget would lead to thousands fewer inspections of businesses and warned HSE office closures and the axing of the HSE infoline, which takes 800 to 1,000 calls a day, were part of the cuts package.

Families Against Corporate Killing (FACK) spokesperson Hilda Palmer said poor health and safety practices cost society billions a year, with business only bearing a small fraction of the costs. 'Instead, the lion's share is 'cost shifted' by business, which creates the risks, to the public purse, victims and their families,' she said. And RMT general secretary Bob Crow warned the 'ConDem cuts will kill', adding: 'Those commentators and politicians who try to trivialise and denigrate health and safety enforcement would be the first to run to their lawyers and the press if it was one of their relatives killed in a preventable accident at work or on public transport.' The union leader said: 'I will tell you what happens when corners are cut on safety regulations - you end up with the carnage of Potters Bar and Hatfield and our trade union will fight tooth and nail to stop our industry from being dragged back to that cavalier approach to maintaining safe standards.' Giant 'We didn't vote to die at work' posters and others accusing prime minister David Cameron of being the real 'job killer' were brandished by protesters outside the House of Commons.

7.3.11

Tax protests inspire national action

The following details have been supplied by the PCS HQ:

Thousands of people have been taking to the streets protesting against the cuts and demanding multinationals and the rich pay the tax they owe. Adam Ramsay, co-editor of brightgreenscotland.org who runs the campaign noshockdoctrine.org.uk, joined the demonstrations, most notably against the government, Vodafone and Topshop which “punctured a hole in the economically illiterate idea that the government has to cut public spending”.

There are lots of ways to show that the cuts which are breaking Britain are not needed. But perhaps the easiest is to look at the money the government doesn't bother to take in taxes from the mega-rich.

For example, Philip Green, who runs the Arcadia group of Topshop, Dorothy Perkins and BHS, doesn't bother to pay much tax. By signing his company over to his wife, Tina, who lives in tax haven Monaco, he has dodged hundreds of millions of pounds.

If the government collected all of the tax we are owed, there would not be a long-term deficit. But instead of closing the loopholes and employing more experts to collect these taxes, the government has decided to lay off thousands of tax collectors.

Now, normally I would be against replacing paid, trained, unionised staff with ad hoc volunteers. But I'm happy to make an exception. And so, in December, across the country, the Big Society Revenue and Customs (also known as UK Uncut) appeared, in our hundreds, at two dozen Topshop branches across the country.

Demands delivered in chants
Our demands were delivered in chants rather than brown envelopes. And we sat across their doorways until they closed. And all across the country, passers-by cheered, gave us food, and even joined in. And so the movement grows.

Two weeks later, the organisers of UK Uncut called for an even bigger day of action dubbed "Pay day". In more than 50 towns and cities, people responded, and again made national headlines. And again, people stopped shopping to cheer, applaud, and join in.

In London's Oxford Street, protesters held a ‘school sports day’ at Topshop, and brought 'library' books to read in Vodafone highlighting the victims of tax dodging. Other protesters ‘brought Monaco to Oxford’ and had a mock grand prix, racing around each of the culprits until they shut.

Small group becomes movement
This movement against tax dodgers was started when a small group of friends were fed up with watching ministers cut our public services while refusing to collect the taxes owed by the rich. They had decided to do something about it. So they met up in Oxford Street, marched into Vodafone, and held signs demanding the £6 billion of tax that experts estimate they have been let off.

The reaction from passers-by was amazing delighted this group of young people was taking action and inspired people across the country. Two days later 30 Vodafone branches nationwide were also shut.

They regrouped, built a more sophisticated website, and prepared their next action, choosing Topshop and attracting enough support shut down its London branch, showing the scale of the anger at this blatant injustice.

Building pressure against government
UK Uncut has punctured a hole in the economically illiterate idea that the government has to cut public spending. But we need to continue to build the pressure.

As we fight to defend the welfare state our parents and grandparents built for us, and as we work to defend our jobs, we will need to expose that old lie that there is no alternative.

The websites falseeconomy.org.uk and noshockdoctrine.org.uk provide excellent resources to campaign against cuts. But ultimately, it is the ability of the internet to link together people on the ground that is really exciting, the new power of the web to allow people to organise to campaign against a Tory party which believes society is best run by the elite.

Get involved
Join actions in your area, and bring your friends, or start your own. All the information you need is on the UK uncut site. We can stop these crazy cuts and we can have fun doing it.

Culture campaign bites back against cuts

The following details have been supplied by the PCS HQ:

PCS activists have stepped up opposition to the cuts in the culture sector by organising a national campaign highlighting the vital role of museums, libraries and historic sites in our communities.

The union has nearly 5,000 members working in the culture, media and sport sector, representing staff at the Department for Culture Media and Sport and essential workers in some of the country’s most renowned institutions, as well the wider heritage and tourism sector.

The Tory-led government’s cuts, which have seen funding slashed by 30% to English Heritage, could lead to the loss of jobs and important regional heritage sites. A 10-15% cut has been announced across the DCMS-funded museums and galleries with many workplaces already hit.

The British Library is shedding 215 staff with more than 80 staff going in the first year. Reading rooms in St Pancras are already being closed because the number of security officers has been reduced.

The British Museum has already limited late night opening and we are concerned that galleries will be closed. Sport England’s budget has been slashed by 32%. A number of regional offices will close and the organisation will be merged with UK Sport.

The National Museum of Science and Industry, the Victoria and Albert Museum and the Natural History Museum are moving to outsource security to a single private contractor, affecting more than 150 PCS members.

DCMS is cutting staff by 50% after the London Olympics with 70 staff going by March. Staff are demoralised and concerned about how the department will function given its responsibility for the royal wedding, 2012 Olympics and Diamond Jubilee.

Organising with other unions
Heritage tourism contributes £20.6 billion to GDP a year, with PCS members playing a pivotal role in delivering this world class service and it is economic nonsense to cut the sector.

The ‘save our cultural assets’ campaign is engaging PCS members and other unions in the widest possible campaign against austerity measures. Arts Council cuts will have a huge impact on local theatres and museums. Workers may be unionised with BECTU, the Musicians’ Union, Equity or Unison and we need to campaign alongside them to save our culture.

The campaign has received strong support, with hundreds of people signing the petition. A leaflet has been published which is being sent to all branches. February sees the launch of the ‘love public services’ campaign, which will provide an opportunity to raise the issue of ‘loving our cultural assets‘. The Royal Wedding in April may provide opportunities to get our message across to the public as there will be an upsurge in tourism.

How to get involved
Encourage your colleagues, friends and families to sign the petition, lobby their local MP, assembly members and councillors.

Challenging compensation scheme changes

The following details have been supplied by the PCS HQ:

PCS is continuing to challenge the government’s massive planned reductions to our hard-fought redundancy rights.

On 21 December the new civil service compensation scheme was imposed. PCS members voted comprehensively to reject the proposals on the civil service compensation scheme, as did members the POA, together representing 60% of civil servants. Four other civil service unions accepted the scheme and Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude has put it in place.

PCS had previously informed the Treasury solicitor of its intention to take a judicial review of the government’s decision to lay a new scheme in parliament, and was due to launch proceedings as Activate went to press. It has also called on the government to reopen negotiations to agree a new scheme that protects members’ rights.

The bill limits compulsory redundancy payouts to 12 months’ pensionable earnings, and voluntary to 15 months. The new scheme changes redundancy compensation for people leaving on compulsory terms below their normal pension age on their final day of service to one year’s pay and 21 months’ pay, plus notice, for voluntary.

For updates check the Q and A section on the PCS website

Led into debt to benefit banks

Andrew Fisher, PCS policy officer, interviewed David Malone, author of the Debt Generation and former BBC documentary maker. The following is the transcript: 

What inspired you to write The Debt Generation?
Sheer frustration is what started me off. There was something about the assurances back in 2007/8 which sounded like lies.

I started to read what financial traders were saying to each other and quickly realised that what they, as insiders, knew to be going on was a million miles away from what you and I were being told. We were being told there was no other way than bailing out the banks. I was reading that there was another way. The more I read the more angry I got and that started me writing. 

What are its conclusions?
That we have been led into vast debts for the benefit of the people who own, run and hold the debts of the big banks. We could and should have made them and their bondholders suffer the consequences of their greed and stupidity. 

What are the prospects for 2011?
Last year was about transforming private debts into public ones. This year will be about enforcing the cuts and austerity the bankers want.
It is also the year that anti-cuts protests will have to pull together. The need for cuts is because of the hundreds of billions we have given and continue to give to the banks. 

Was public sector spending a cause of the crisis?
The financial crisis was wholly caused by the greed, stupidity and fraud of multimillionaire bankers.

Gordon Brown and Labour were as mesmerised by the City as the government before and after them. They are all in awe of and in the pay of the financial class. They are cutting with a will to achieve via this crisis what they could never achieve through the ballot box – the savaging of everything that makes this country civilised. 

So will cutting the public sector solve the crisis?
Cutting public spending will not help growth. It will impoverish the most vulnerable to protect the wealth of the most powerful.

It is true that if we simply went on borrowing or printing we would find ourselves in the situation Ireland and Greece are in. But it is the great lie of our time to be told that it is either borrow until we bust or cut till we bleed.

The truth is our debts are too high because we have given hundreds of billions to bail out banks we did not have to save. We need banks but not these banks.

There do need to be cuts but they should be in our support for moribund, reckless and sociopathic banks.

In 2011 we must defend what we believe this country is about.

For further information see debtgeneration