8.5.12

Welfare cuts: We all stand to suffer


Once we were 'poor dears', now we are 'benefit cheats', said a demonstrator at last year's rally of disabled people against the welfare bill neatly summing up the government-instigated hate campaign against the most vulnerable in society.

Cameron and Osborne aim to make welfare itself a dirty word implying taxpayers’ money is being wasted on undeserving “shirkers” who receive over-generous payments from a system riddled with fraud and delivered by an inefficient and expensive public sector. All lies and myths. Unemployment is in reality about five million, including one million young people. Benefits are the lowest in Europe, except Estonia, and the contentious figure of £1 billion lost to fraud is dwarfed by the £16bn in unclaimed benefits.

A quarter of all cuts are from welfare with another £10bn announced in the recent budget. These cuts will mean the impoverishment and marginalisation of millions and drive those least able to defend themselves into appalling poverty. But it is also a fundamental assault on democracy and accountability as the government never sought nor was given a mandate to destroy the safety net that was, however inadequate, in place to prevent people from literally starving or going without shelter. Behind it all is privatisation in an attempt to slash the social wage and bash the victims of the economic crisis to extract every last drop of profit.

Welfare top priority
The government attempts to divide employed from unemployed workers but we all suffer from the welfare proposals which end universal benefits and cap tax credits, affecting millions of low-paid people, the very members we represent. Welfare must be a top priority for the trade union movement, as it clearly is for the government.

PCS’s welfare alternative pamphlet is a vital contribution to this debate and a guide to action. Welfare is a fundamental right, not a privilege. The labour and trade union movement demanded adequate welfare provision to afford working people some basic protection against the vagaries of a ruthless system that placed profit above people. State provision was demanded because the private sector and the charities were incapable of delivering such services in an effective way.

It is important we engage in and define the terms of the debate while fighting these attacks. Welfare, or more precisely social security, concerns issues like unemployment and disability rights but also low income, housing, child poverty and childcare and pensions. It is at the very core of the debate about what type of society we want to live in and the quality of life itself.

Demanding a fair system
For our union particularly welfare is an industrial issue - our members administer the system. That means our demands rightly include the need for the system to be delivered by the public sector and that public sector workers must be well trained, adequately resourced and well paid.

But it is a social and political issue too and we must be at the forefront of raising and popularising demands for a fair and equitable welfare system. That means arguing for job creation, a dignified standard of living for those unable to work for whatever reasons, much increased benefit levels and a substantially increased minimum wage or living wage.

We demand an end to privatised assessment for disabled people, that child poverty is tackled and for adequate childcare. The principal cause of child poverty - low benefit and pay levels - needs to be removed as well as an end to the exploitation of housing benefit by unscrupulous landlords and sufficient council should be provided. There are sound economic arguments too: all serious research shows strong welfare systems produce stronger economies, support not punishment is the way to get people into work. 

We have held excellent public meetings on welfare recently. Let’s now step up this work which is a vital part of our opposition to the cuts and attacks on our members