4.2.10

PCS response to Sir Gus O' Donnell

Sir Gus O’Donnell, Head of the Civil Service, has called on PCS members not to vote ‘yes’ in the national ballot on action over the compensation scheme and has stated that other unions have accepted the changes to the scheme proposed by the government.

Despite previously saying that it had reached its ‘final position’, the government has, as Sir Gus says, moved from its original draconian proposals and offered some degree of protection to some existing civil and public servants. These concessions have been won by the resolute opposition of PCS members over 18,000 of whom emailed the Cabinet Office opposing the government’s plans to slash their entitlement to redundancy payments and by the lobbying amongst MPs carried out by the union, 138 of whom have signed an early day motion calling on the government to change course. The concessions would still leave many thousands of PCS members unprotected, however.

PCS represents almost three times the number of civil and public servants than the other unions combined. It is no surprise that the other unions have accepted the proposals. Some of them would have accepted even the original proposals and have since then argued for each new proposal to be accepted despite the detrimental effect on the majority of staff.

But the latest proposals leave a very large proportion of PCS members unprotected. The details will be available on the PCS website. As a union which stands for fairness and solidarity, we have decided that we must continue to try to find a settlement which covers all our members, not just some.

Moreover, accepting such divisive cuts in so many people’s entitlements, as the other unions have done, would weaken the whole union and make job losses and compulsory redundancy much more likely at a time when we know that the major political parties are planning such cuts.

The latest proposals made by Cabinet Office were, in fact, conditional on PCS giving up its right to seek legal protection in the courts. We cannot accept that and we will press ahead this week with a judicial review along with NIPSA, a sister union.

We must continue to build pressure on the government to come to a fair agreement. PCS has identified ways the government could save money while also protecting members’ entitlements. Sir Gus says he has moved a considerable way from the original proposals made last summer. If we are united we can move him further towards a settlement that will protect all PCS members from redundancy.

We urge you to vote `yes’ to both questions in the ballot and ensure that Sir Gus sits down with PCS and talks about how to avoid a dispute, without crude attempts to divide us.
Yours sincerely,

Mark Serwotka Janice Godrich
General Secretary President