15.10.13

PCS condemns DWP’s announcement to transfer 10 sites to Child Maintenance Group



The following details have been provided by the PCS DWP Group:
DWP has announced today their plans to compulsorily transfer 10 offices into the Child Maintenance Group (CMG). The transfers are due to take place between January 2014 and March 2015. The offices, with estimated dates of transfer, are:

Walsall Pension Centre (Jan-Mar 2014)
Plymouth Benefit Centre (Jan – Mar 2014)
Leicester Pension Centre (April to June 2014)
Leicester Benefit Centre (July – Sept 2014)
Coatbridge Benefit Centre (July – Sept 2014)
Newcastle Contact Centre (July – Sept 2014)
Newcastle Benefit Centre (Sept – Dec 2014)
Glasgow Springburn Contact Centre (Sept – Dec 2014)
Kilmarnock Benefit Centre (Jan – Mar 2015)
Greenock Benefit Centre (Jan – Mar 2015)

Management intend to move 2,000 staff into CMG through these transfers. The general intention is to transfer all of the staff on site into CMG. However there are some sites where the grade mix does not reflect the grade mix required by CMG and so some staff are expected to remain in their current business and not transfer to CMG.

Staff who do not transfer will either have work moved to them or will be redeployed into other DWP offices. Management were unable to clarify how these staff will be identified or selected, but are most likely to be in the AA, EO or HEO grades. Management have assured PCS that this transfer is not a precursor to compulsory redundancy for any of the staff in these offices.

These transfers come on top of the announcements earlier this year of staff transfers to CMG at Tyne View Park Pensions, York and Ravenhurst Benefit Centres, Hastings Benefit Integrity Centre and the Visiting Booking Centre in Birmingham.

Garston and Bootle Contact Centres
In addition to the transfer of these 10 sites, management will also be seeking around 200 staff from Garston and Bootle Contact Centres to agree to transfer on a voluntary basis to Birkenhead CSAC. Management are confident that they will be able to secure these numbers through voluntary transfers. If this is not achieved, management have committed themselves to talking to PCS again before deciding if any other measures may be required.

Why do CMG need extra staff?
CMG requires these additional staff in order to be able to deliver the new Child Maintenance scheme while also continuing to administer the old Child Maintenance scheme. The requirement for these 2,000 additional staff for CMG is based on DWP’s assumptions of the numbers of people who will take-up the new Child Maintenance Scheme. Once the new scheme is fully implemented, and as the numbers on the old scheme decline, the staffing requirements of CMG are also likely to reduce accordingly. CMG’s long term plan is to concentrate the vast majority of its work in the main CSAC’s, but this is not expected to happen before 2016.

How have these sites been selected?
Management made clear that the reason was location. CMG management were keen to have the transferring sites in geographical clusters, located as near as possible to their existing main locations. This is because it makes it easier for them to manage rather than having the offices spread around the country. It will also mean that many of the staff transferring into CMG should be within redeployment distance of the main CMG sites.

However CMG have stated that there are no immediate plans to close any of the transferring offices and move all the staff into nearby CMG sites. Any future estates rationalisation would only be done as part of the ongoing DWP review of all DWP sites.

Impact on terms and conditions
Staff will continue to work in their existing office and there will be no changes to members’ contractual terms and conditions. However CMG does operate some departmental HR policies differently to DWP Operations. In particular they operate a more restrictive flexi time policy than the flexi arrangements that applies in most of DWP Operations. Also CMG does not allow its staff to have a 10 minute morning and afternoon break. The feedback from members who transferred into CMG in the earlier wave of transfers has been overwhelmingly negative once members came face to face with the reality of CMG’s unnecessarily restrictive working arrangements

PCS demands no detrimental changes
PCS has pressed management to agree to no detrimental changes to these working arrangements as a result of this change of duties. There is no reason at all why being rebadged as CMG should lead to the loss of paid breaks or to worse flexi arrangements. We fear that management may be about to make the same mistake as happened with the TPIP transfer where a change of role was combined with an attack on members working conditions.

Further talks agreed
PCS has made this case to management very strongly. Management have now agreed to further discussions, after today’s announcement, with PCS on this issue to try and agree working arrangements that can be agreeable to all concerned. This transfer should not be used to impose worse conditions on the staff transferring, but rather to harmonise working conditions at the optimum level across all of DWP Operations, including CMG. PCS is continuing to seek a resolution to this issue to protect members working conditions.

PCS’ Reaction
PCS condemns the decision to strip 2,000 staff out of DWP Operations. While we welcome the decision to create an additional 2,000 staff in CMG we firmly believe that these extra posts should have been filled by new recruits and not by robbing staff from other parts of DWP.

PCS does not accept that either the Pensions, Benefits or Network Services Directorates are in a position to sustain the loss of so many staff. Workloads remain very high across DWP Operations, with our members operating under excessive pressure and stress.

There are huge backlogs of work in Pensions, targets regularly being missed in Benefits and annual leave is already subject to excessive restrictions in DWP Operations. Incredibly, at the same time that Contact Centre Services has agreed to lose 2 Contact Centres, the management there are talking to their staff about what extra measures may be needed to meet the current shortage of staff.

Thousands of jobs to be cut
It makes no sense to cut staffing in DWP Operations in this way. These 2,000 staff cuts come on top of the recent exit package announcement seeking 1,700 staff to agree to leave DWP Operations in March 2014. When attrition is taken into account, Operations will have lost several thousand staff, but with no reductions in workloads. Cuts on this scale can only lead to more backlogs, more missed targets, more calls left unanswered and ever worse customer service. It can be expected that this will also put additional pressure on members in Job Centres when benefits go unpaid.

PCS has put all of these concerns to DWP management. We received a rather complacent response claiming that there is capacity to lose all these staff, but with little explanation as to where this additional capacity was. Given the anticipated increases in workloads through the recent announcements of increased conditionality, and the need to convert 8 million claims to Universal Credit by 2017, there is no obvious spare capacity within Operations.

More staff not less
Management should be recruiting more staff now. We fear that the loss of these staff from Operations will simply place even more pressure on members to meet ever-increasing targets. This is unacceptable. 25,000 staff have left DWP since May 2010. DWP must stop haemorrhaging staff and begin to recruit and promote staff across all parts of DWP to end the remorseless pressure our members face and to deliver the high quality customer service the public expects.

The GEC will meet, after taking the views of branches and members involved in the transfer into account, to consider how to take forward our staffing campaign in the light of these savage staffing cuts. Members will be consulted and involved in future plans